Different
Home Designs Have Different Values
By Chris Knoppe, Ohio
Rehab Loans
When
trying to answer the challenging question (especially in today’s market)
of “How much is this house worth?” investors need to take the house
design and layout into consideration.
This probably seems obvious to many people, and almost everyone
probably knows this in the back of their mind, but it’s amazing how
often this attribute gets overlooked.
It’s common for one to look for “comparable sales” or
“comps” in close proximity to the subject property in order to derive
an estimated value, but there is usually a lot of grey area when defining
what is “comparable.” Simple
screening methods look for comps with similar square footage of living
area. The number of bedrooms
and bathrooms is also usually taken into consideration.
That is a good starting point, but value can differ greatly even
within this criteria. One way
to narrow down an estimated value is to consider a house’s design.
This is a big factor in value for two reasons: 1) certain designs
are more expensive to build than others, and 2) certain designs are more
desirable to potential home buyers. I’ll
define the 4 most common home designs and then explain some pros and cons
and of each how they differ in value.
Ranch:
Only 1 living level above ground. May
or may not have a basement.
2-Story:
Has 2 full
living levels above ground, 1 on top of the other with a full staircase
connecting the upper level to the lower.
May or may not have a basement.
Split
Level: Has at
least three levels of living area, each staggered in height and connected
to next highest level with a partial staircase.
Generally do not have a full basement because the lowest level is
partial living area and partial unfinished mechanical storage.
Bi-Level:
Has 1 level
completely above ground and a lower level that is partially above ground.
Never has a basement in addition to the lower level.
Across
the board, houses with basement and garages are going to be more valuable
because houses with these attributes are more expensive to build and they
also are more appealing to potential home buyers.
Also, “living area” is generally above ground (and fully
underground basements are not considered in living area square footage).
Now let’s discuss the difference in construction costs for these
four designs:
Ranch:
The most expensive to build per square foot because all living area sits
on the house foundation rather than more cost effectively building
multiple levels on top of one another. The roof also covers all the living
area. Twice as much foundation
& roof for the same amount of living area = more expensive to build.
2-Story:
The next most
expensive to build, especially if it has a full underground basement.
Split
Level: Very
cost effective because the amount of foundation is minimized versus the
amount of living area you get from the several levels of the home.
Bi-Level:
On a square
footage basis, this model is the cheapest to construct if the lower level
(which is only partially above ground) is considered living area square
footage. If only the upper
level square footage is considered living area, then the cost is
comparable to a ranch.
Most
investors are not home builders, so they probably don’t care about how
much it costs to build a house, so now let’s discuss how each design
affects market value.
Ranch:
Preferred by many home buyers (especially the aging population) because it
does not have stairs. Like its
construction cost, this model will have a higher market value on a per
square foot basis versus any other type of design.
2-Story:
This model is
esthetically pleasing, offers good living space, and usually has a
basement that is not included in the living area square footage. These
factors typically account for the second highest market valued per square
foot.
Split
Level: Offers
maximum living space for the overall size of the house, but some of that
living space is partially below ground and there is no full basement.
This design valued behind the 2-Story per square foot.
Bi-Level:
Because the
lower level (mostly underground) is typically included in living area
square footage, and there is no other basement level, this design has the
lowest value per square foot. If
only using the upper level square footage, the value is comparable to a
ranch with the same (upper level) square footage that also has a basement.
In
Summary, when you are shopping for potential investment houses, be aware
of these different designs and how they affect the value of your
investment and your potential for equity/profit.
Be sure that you are using truly “comparable” sales and not
simply going by the square footage.
P.S.
- Want to flip houses? Call
Me!
Please
note that this column reflects the opinion of Chris Knoppe.
Comments or questions can be directed to Chris.Knoppe@OhioRehabLoans.com.
For more information about Ohio Rehab Loans visit www.OhioRehabLoans.com
or call 614-433-0570 ext 101.